The Top 7 Free and Paid Alternatives to Ahrefs
.png)
This is a list of trustworthy alternatives to Ahrefs, a well-known SEO tool.
In this article, I'll:
- Let's compare each of them to Ahrefs.
- My own practical knowledge of each instrument
Check out the list below for your best choices if Ahrefs isn't a suitable fit for you.
The Top 7 Ahrefs Replacements
1. Ubersuggest
One of the best free SEO tools out there, in my opinion, is Ubersuggest.
Why?
Because it has several characteristics, such as:
They are all firm, too.
If you're new to SEO, Ubersuggest is actually a smart pick.
Previously, using Ubersuggest was totally free. But a premium plan has recently been introduced.
The free version is still dependable. However, if you wish to access other services or receive more reports, the subscription plan may be a good option for you. For instance, a premium subscription offers endless SEO audit reports.
Which is advantageous if you oversee several websites or have SEO clientele.
Ubersuggest vs. Ahrefs Comparison
As I have mentioned, Ubersuggest is a top-notch product. It does not, however, contain as many features as Ahrefs.
Therefore, if I had to choose between Ubersuggest and Ahrefs based only on functionality, I would choose Ahrefs.
Cost is yet another important factor that must be considered.
Ahrefs has a $99/month entry point.
Ubersuggest costs a fixed $29 per month.
Even if you have a significant marketing budget, Ahrefs is still definitely the best option. Ubersuggest, though, is undoubtedly the best option in terms of sheer value.
Ubersuggest vs. Ahrefs Comparison
As I have mentioned, Ubersuggest is a top-notch product. It does not, however, contain as many features as Ahrefs.
Therefore, if I had to choose between Ubersuggest and Ahrefs based only on functionality, I would choose Ahrefs.
Cost is yet another important factor that must be considered.
Ahrefs has a $99/month entry point.
Ubersuggest costs a fixed $29 per month.
Even if you have a significant marketing budget, Ahrefs is still definitely the best option. Ubersuggest, though, is undoubtedly the best option in terms of sheer value.
2. SEMrush
One of the most well-liked SEO tools available is SEMrush.
And rightfully so; it's very, really wonderful.
In reality, I've been a paid SEMrush user for more than 8 years, during which time I've witnessed the program's transformation from a PPC keyword research tool to a comprehensive SEO software package.
Today, SEMrush includes a ton of useful capabilities in addition to its normal keyword research functions (such search volume, CPC, etc.), including:
In terms of both feature number and quality, SEMrush is, in my opinion, the application that comes closest to Ahrefs currently available.
One of the most well-liked SEO tools available is SEMrush.
And rightfully so; it's very, really wonderful.
In reality, I've been a paid SEMrush user for more than 8 years, during which time I've witnessed the program's transformation from a PPC keyword research tool to a comprehensive SEO software package.
Today, SEMrush includes a ton of useful capabilities in addition to its normal keyword research functions (such search volume, CPC, etc.), including:
- Analytics of website traffic (the sources of the traffic)
- Backlink monitoring
- SEO site audits with
- rank tracking
- Analysis of on-page SEO and
- much more
In terms of both feature number and quality, SEMrush is, in my opinion, the application that comes closest to Ahrefs currently available.
Comparing SEMrush with Ahrefs
Here is a detailed comparison of SEMrush and Ahrefs that I have written. Check out their review if you want a super-detailed comparison of Ahrefs vs SEMrush.
However, Ahrefs and SEMrush are fundamentally quite similar.
Similar in terms of characteristics. Comparable in terms of quality. even similar in terms of cost
Here is a detailed comparison of SEMrush and Ahrefs that I have written. Check out their review if you want a super-detailed comparison of Ahrefs vs SEMrush.
However, Ahrefs and SEMrush are fundamentally quite similar.
Similar in terms of characteristics. Comparable in terms of quality. even similar in terms of cost
Personally, I like Ahrefs more. mostly because I adore their user experience. Particularly, Ahrefs' superb UX makes it simpler for me to complete my task.
So even if SEMrush and Ahrefs have the exact same functionality, SEMrush is more difficult to locate and utilize.
For instance, Ahrefs has a VERY useful sidebar that connects straight to critical findings (such broken links, internal connections, and anchor text) when you evaluate a website. You also have a sidebar in SEMrush. It simply relates to features, though.
You have to delve further into each feature to locate what you're looking for specifically.
Obviously, this is a matter of preference. In certain cases, SEMrush's user experience is preferable to Ahrefs'.
So even if SEMrush and Ahrefs have the exact same functionality, SEMrush is more difficult to locate and utilize.
For instance, Ahrefs has a VERY useful sidebar that connects straight to critical findings (such broken links, internal connections, and anchor text) when you evaluate a website. You also have a sidebar in SEMrush. It simply relates to features, though.
You have to delve further into each feature to locate what you're looking for specifically.
Obviously, this is a matter of preference. In certain cases, SEMrush's user experience is preferable to Ahrefs'.
But Ahrefs and SEMrush are nearly matched in terms of just features. So I suggest giving SEMrush a try if you're looking for an Ahrefs substitute with a list of comparable capabilities.
3. Keep an eye on links
According to Monitor Backlinks, its monitoring tool is "the best for backlinks and keywords, period."
In 2015, I initially registered for Monitor Backlinks. And today I tried the tool once more.
It does, however, offer a few really amazing features. Take a disavow tool, for instance.
However, the tool's main flaw is that it doesn't genuinely offer anything new.
Basically, Monitor Backlinks merely extracts information from Majestic and Moz. and includes several extras (like a rank tracker).
Monitor Backlinks and Ahrefs Comparison
Monitor Backlinks, in my opinion, is incomparable to Ahrefs. They're far apart. For instance, you may retrieve 10,000 rows of backlink data using Ahrefs.
According to Monitor Backlinks, its monitoring tool is "the best for backlinks and keywords, period."
In 2015, I initially registered for Monitor Backlinks. And today I tried the tool once more.
It does, however, offer a few really amazing features. Take a disavow tool, for instance.
However, the tool's main flaw is that it doesn't genuinely offer anything new.
Basically, Monitor Backlinks merely extracts information from Majestic and Moz. and includes several extras (like a rank tracker).
Monitor Backlinks and Ahrefs Comparison
Monitor Backlinks, in my opinion, is incomparable to Ahrefs. They're far apart. For instance, you may retrieve 10,000 rows of backlink data using Ahrefs.
Your only option with Monitor Backlinks is 4k.
Additionally, it is lacking a keyword tool, a competition analysis function, domain comparisons, and statistics on organic traffic. Also a long list of other functions that Ahrefs offers. A trial version of Monitor Backlinks is available. this could aid in giving you a sense of the instrument.Therefore, go ahead and try it.
Monitor Backlinks, however, is so constrained in my opinion that it hardly counts as an Ahrefs substitute.
Additionally, it is lacking a keyword tool, a competition analysis function, domain comparisons, and statistics on organic traffic. Also a long list of other functions that Ahrefs offers. A trial version of Monitor Backlinks is available. this could aid in giving you a sense of the instrument.Therefore, go ahead and try it.
Monitor Backlinks, however, is so constrained in my opinion that it hardly counts as an Ahrefs substitute.
4. Mangools
Not your normal SEO software suite, Mangools.
Mangools is actually five distinct tools, not a collection of merged functionality.
For illustration, suppose you want to know the terms a website ranks for in Google.
You would then launch "KWFinder," select "Search by domain," and enter the domain you wish to examine:
You now want to look at the backlinks to that website. You must now return to your dashboard, choose "LinkMiner," to access their backlink tool, and repeat the procedure from scratch.
So yes, this configuration isn't optimal. Furthermore, it makes utilizing the tool much more difficult than it has to be.
Not your normal SEO software suite, Mangools.
Mangools is actually five distinct tools, not a collection of merged functionality.
For illustration, suppose you want to know the terms a website ranks for in Google.
You would then launch "KWFinder," select "Search by domain," and enter the domain you wish to examine:
You now want to look at the backlinks to that website. You must now return to your dashboard, choose "LinkMiner," to access their backlink tool, and repeat the procedure from scratch.
So yes, this configuration isn't optimal. Furthermore, it makes utilizing the tool much more difficult than it has to be.
Having said that, the tools themselves are actually quite good, as I mention in my most recent Mangools review. Not nearly on SEMrush's level. Not terrible, though.
Just please don't sew the tools together.
Comparing Mangools and Ahrefs
Mangools, in my opinion, doesn't even exist in the same world as Ahrefs. And I'm not only referring to the fact that using Mangools requires 3-5 times as many clicks as using Ahrefs.
Additionally, the characteristics themselves are not nearly as strong as Ahrefs. Mangools' backlink analysis function, for instance, doesn't provide a lot of criteria. You essentially have filters for active vs. removed, dofollow vs. nofollow, etc. that's pretty much it.
Just please don't sew the tools together.
Comparing Mangools and Ahrefs
Mangools, in my opinion, doesn't even exist in the same world as Ahrefs. And I'm not only referring to the fact that using Mangools requires 3-5 times as many clicks as using Ahrefs.
Additionally, the characteristics themselves are not nearly as strong as Ahrefs. Mangools' backlink analysis function, for instance, doesn't provide a lot of criteria. You essentially have filters for active vs. removed, dofollow vs. nofollow, etc. that's pretty much it.
You may filter with Ahrefs by literally hundreds of criteria, including link type, language, URL Rating, and more.
That's particularly helpful if you want to concentrate on a specific type of backlink.
It is evident that Ahrefs is a more effective SEO tool overall than Mangools. But is it really a better deal?
The "Basic" plan from Mangools costs around half as much as the "Starter" plan from Ahrefs.
(Note: if you join up for an annual plan, the price of Mangools Basic drops down to $29).
Personally, I don't believe the price difference is worthwhile. If a tool is 10 times better, I'd rather pay two times as much. That's why I gladly make a monthly payment for Ahrefs.
That's particularly helpful if you want to concentrate on a specific type of backlink.
It is evident that Ahrefs is a more effective SEO tool overall than Mangools. But is it really a better deal?
The "Basic" plan from Mangools costs around half as much as the "Starter" plan from Ahrefs.
(Note: if you join up for an annual plan, the price of Mangools Basic drops down to $29).
Personally, I don't believe the price difference is worthwhile. If a tool is 10 times better, I'd rather pay two times as much. That's why I gladly make a monthly payment for Ahrefs.
But ultimately, it's up to you. Even if your budget is really limited, Mangools still has a lot to offer. However, if you have $100 to spare each month, I suggest using a service like Ahrefs or SEMrush.
5. Moz Pro
Let me go right to the point:
Not a terrible SEO tool is Moz Pro.
However, it falls short of Ahrefs and SEMrush, its two main rivals, in terms of quality.
Because its features haven't truly kept up with the competition, Moz Pro's primary problem is that it.
While Ahrefs and SEMrush regularly release updates, Moz Pro has only released one new feature in recent months: the "Keyword Explorer" keyword tool.
Yes, the Moz keyword tool is excellent. Additionally, it excels at coming up with long-tail keyword recommendations. However, I can make a similar claim about Ahrefs and SEMrush.
Let me go right to the point:
Not a terrible SEO tool is Moz Pro.
However, it falls short of Ahrefs and SEMrush, its two main rivals, in terms of quality.
Because its features haven't truly kept up with the competition, Moz Pro's primary problem is that it.
While Ahrefs and SEMrush regularly release updates, Moz Pro has only released one new feature in recent months: the "Keyword Explorer" keyword tool.
Yes, the Moz keyword tool is excellent. Additionally, it excels at coming up with long-tail keyword recommendations. However, I can make a similar claim about Ahrefs and SEMrush.
Comparing Moz Pro with Ahrefs
A few of the best backlink checkers were recently put to the test by me.
And we discovered that Moz actually performed on par with the other tools. Links between the two results happen soon. In addition, the index's overall amount of backlinks.
The primary problem with Moz Pro is their $99/month fee. And if you use SEMrush or Ahrefs, I think you'll receive far better return on your investment.
A few of the best backlink checkers were recently put to the test by me.
And we discovered that Moz actually performed on par with the other tools. Links between the two results happen soon. In addition, the index's overall amount of backlinks.
The primary problem with Moz Pro is their $99/month fee. And if you use SEMrush or Ahrefs, I think you'll receive far better return on your investment.
6. imposing
Majestic SEO is still one of the best SEO tools available, despite feeling a touch antiquated.
Majestic is solely concerned with backlink analysis. Majestic SEO is most likely not the right choice for you if what you want is a solution that handles all of your SEO responsibilities in one location.
But if backlink information is all you're interested in, Majestic SEO is really quite reliable.
In reality, Majestic wasn't that far behind other important SEO tools in the backlink checker comparison I described before.
In fact, it discovered more backlinks than SEMrush did for several websites.
I can't really fault the data you find in the tool, as you can see in my whole Majestic evaluation.It's really good technology.
Majestic SEO is still one of the best SEO tools available, despite feeling a touch antiquated.
Majestic is solely concerned with backlink analysis. Majestic SEO is most likely not the right choice for you if what you want is a solution that handles all of your SEO responsibilities in one location.
But if backlink information is all you're interested in, Majestic SEO is really quite reliable.
In reality, Majestic wasn't that far behind other important SEO tools in the backlink checker comparison I described before.
In fact, it discovered more backlinks than SEMrush did for several websites.
I can't really fault the data you find in the tool, as you can see in my whole Majestic evaluation.It's really good technology.
The UX is the biggest issue since it is so very old. And I'm not simply referring about the appearance and texture. That doesn't really concern me. More so, using the backend is challenging. specifically in contrast to Ahrefs.
Majestic's Comparability to Ahrefs
Majestic SEO is a decent Ahrefs substitute in terms of only backlink information.
However, you can't truly judge a tool only on the information it offers. UX, important features, customer support, and other factors must all be considered.
And when all of it is considered, Ahrefs comes out well ahead.You may utilize Ahrefs, as an illustration, for essentially all of your SEO duties. research on keywords. SEO techniques. Rank Monitoring. and more.
None of it is present at Majestic. It is purely a link-building technique.
Nevertheless, Majestic's pricing reflects the things it lacks. It begins at $50 per month.
it is nearly half Ahrefs' cost.
If you're somebody who pretty much ONLY cares about backlinks, you'll probably get a ton of value out of that $50.
However, Ahrefs is without a doubt your finest option if you're searching for an all-in-one SEO solution. But Ahrefs is arguably your best option if you want an all-in-one SEO tool.
Majestic's Comparability to Ahrefs
Majestic SEO is a decent Ahrefs substitute in terms of only backlink information.
However, you can't truly judge a tool only on the information it offers. UX, important features, customer support, and other factors must all be considered.
And when all of it is considered, Ahrefs comes out well ahead.You may utilize Ahrefs, as an illustration, for essentially all of your SEO duties. research on keywords. SEO techniques. Rank Monitoring. and more.
None of it is present at Majestic. It is purely a link-building technique.
Nevertheless, Majestic's pricing reflects the things it lacks. It begins at $50 per month.
it is nearly half Ahrefs' cost.
If you're somebody who pretty much ONLY cares about backlinks, you'll probably get a ton of value out of that $50.
However, Ahrefs is without a doubt your finest option if you're searching for an all-in-one SEO solution. But Ahrefs is arguably your best option if you want an all-in-one SEO tool.
7.BuzzSumo
Let's look at BuzzSumo after that.
BuzzSumo isn't primarily focused on SEO, in contrast to some of the other tools I've highlighted here.It primarily functions as a content marketing tool.
So why does BuzzSumo compile this list of alternatives to Ahrefs?
First, SEO and content marketing cross across. A LOT.
Or, to put it another way, your website can be completely optimized. However, in order to rank nowadays, your material must be AMAZING.
Additionally, BuzzSumo has a few SEO-related services (such as a useful backlinks tool):
So sure, one of my favorite marketing tools is BuzzSumo. And by making my material better, it indirectly increased my SEO.
Let's look at BuzzSumo after that.
BuzzSumo isn't primarily focused on SEO, in contrast to some of the other tools I've highlighted here.It primarily functions as a content marketing tool.
So why does BuzzSumo compile this list of alternatives to Ahrefs?
First, SEO and content marketing cross across. A LOT.
Or, to put it another way, your website can be completely optimized. However, in order to rank nowadays, your material must be AMAZING.
Additionally, BuzzSumo has a few SEO-related services (such as a useful backlinks tool):
So sure, one of my favorite marketing tools is BuzzSumo. And by making my material better, it indirectly increased my SEO.
Comparing Buzzsumo with Ahrefs
Ahrefs and BuzzSumo are two very separate tools, to be clear.
For instance, BuzzSumo lacks several of Ahrefs' essential SEO capabilities, such as the site audit tool.
Additionally, BuzzSumo has a number of content-focused capabilities that Ahrefs does not, such as mention monitoring.
The two instruments do, however, have certain similarities. Examples of tools that can help you locate material with a lot of social media shares are Ahrefs and BuzzSumo.
Therefore, it is not relevant to ask how BuzzSumo compares to Ahrefs. It reads something like this: "Do you want an SEO-focused tool (Ahrefs)? is BuzzSumo, a platform that aids in content marketing?”.
For instance, BuzzSumo lacks several of Ahrefs' essential SEO capabilities, such as the site audit tool.
Additionally, BuzzSumo has a number of content-focused capabilities that Ahrefs does not, such as mention monitoring.
The two instruments do, however, have certain similarities. Examples of tools that can help you locate material with a lot of social media shares are Ahrefs and BuzzSumo.
Therefore, it is not relevant to ask how BuzzSumo compares to Ahrefs. It reads something like this: "Do you want an SEO-focused tool (Ahrefs)? is BuzzSumo, a platform that aids in content marketing?”.
If your sole goal is to raise your Google rankings, I recommend sticking with Ahrefs or one of the other tools I've highlighted. However, BuzzSumo will be very useful if you want SEO to be more of a side effect of your content marketing.
There is therefore no right or incorrect response. It depends on the kind of digital marketing you're currently doing.
Personally, I frequently employ both. I also use Ahrefs more frequently than BuzzSumo because I'm more focused on SEO.
However, many people I know utilize BuzzSumo on a daily basis while seldom logging into Ahrefs. Therefore, it truly depends. Added benefit.
Serpstat is the last substitute we have for Ahrefs.
An "All-in-One SEO platform" is what Serpstat claims to be.
And it mostly succeeds. Serpstat includes capabilities like backlink analysis, data on organic ranks, and others that you would anticipate from an SEO software package.
However, I'm not sure whether the features are all that wonderful in and of themselves.
For instance, Backlinko's Top SEO Keywords Report indicates that my top three keywords are YouTube views, pogosticking, and... as well as "press released"?
Naturally, I don't anticipate this information to be entirely accurate. For that, you'd need my Google Analytics. But these figures are wildly incorrect.
However, its "Backlink Dashboard" is rather impressive. I applied it to my backlink profile analysis. And it was discovered that referring domains total 21.4K.
Comparing Ahrefs and Serpstat
Many of Ahrefs' features are also seen in Serpstat.However, I don't believe any of them can compare to Ahrefs.
Since they both theoretically have the same capability, my organic keywords report in Ahrefs, for instance, is considerably more accurate than Serpstat's. But one is much superior to the other.
The backlink analysis function of Serpstat is the only one that can be compared to Ahrefs. There is a sizable index. It is also rather simple to use.
There is therefore no right or incorrect response. It depends on the kind of digital marketing you're currently doing.
Personally, I frequently employ both. I also use Ahrefs more frequently than BuzzSumo because I'm more focused on SEO.
However, many people I know utilize BuzzSumo on a daily basis while seldom logging into Ahrefs. Therefore, it truly depends. Added benefit.
Serpstat is the last substitute we have for Ahrefs.
An "All-in-One SEO platform" is what Serpstat claims to be.
And it mostly succeeds. Serpstat includes capabilities like backlink analysis, data on organic ranks, and others that you would anticipate from an SEO software package.
However, I'm not sure whether the features are all that wonderful in and of themselves.
For instance, Backlinko's Top SEO Keywords Report indicates that my top three keywords are YouTube views, pogosticking, and... as well as "press released"?
Naturally, I don't anticipate this information to be entirely accurate. For that, you'd need my Google Analytics. But these figures are wildly incorrect.
However, its "Backlink Dashboard" is rather impressive. I applied it to my backlink profile analysis. And it was discovered that referring domains total 21.4K.
Comparing Ahrefs and Serpstat
Many of Ahrefs' features are also seen in Serpstat.However, I don't believe any of them can compare to Ahrefs.
Since they both theoretically have the same capability, my organic keywords report in Ahrefs, for instance, is considerably more accurate than Serpstat's. But one is much superior to the other.
The backlink analysis function of Serpstat is the only one that can be compared to Ahrefs. There is a sizable index. It is also rather simple to use.
Visit More:
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment